Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate‐ and Texas red‐conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization

Genetic alterations in primary breast cancers and their metastases: direct comparison using modified comparative genomic hybridization.

Breast tumor development and progression are thought to be driven by an accumulation of genetic alterations, but little is known about the specific changes that occur during the metastatic process. We analyzed pairs of primary breast cancers and their matched lymph node metastases from 11 patients, pairs of primaries and distant metastases from three patients, and pairs of primaries, and local ...

Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH)

comparison of zoe and vitapex for canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth

چکیده ندارد.

PHOTOPROBER® Biotin: An Alternative Method for Labeling Archival DNA for Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) represents a powerful method for screening the entire genome of solid tumors for chromosomal imbalances. Particularly it enabled the molecular cytogenetic analysis of archival, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. A well-known dilemma, however, is the poor DNA quality of this material with fragment sizes below 1000 bp. Nick translation, the co...

Labeling fluorescence in situ hybridization probes for genomic targets.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) requires nucleic acid probes, including deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), ribonucleic acid (RNA), or nucleic acid analogs, labeled directly with fluorophores, or capable of indirect association with fluorophores. The nucleic acid provides the FISH assay with its specificity through complementary pairing of the probe nucleotides with nucleotides of the target...